In a recent address to the Corporation of Limerick, the Lord Bishop of Limerick delved into his stance on past and present political movements in Ireland. While some of his statements offer clarity regarding his perspective, others appear to present a more ambiguous picture.

Regarding his position on the “Plan of Campaign,” the Bishop asserts that he engaged in controversies out of a sense of duty, emphasizing his defence of the moral law rather than mere political considerations. Similarly, his stance on educational matters reflects a commitment to principles guided by moral imperatives.

However, when it comes to contemporary controversies, the logic behind the Bishop’s statements seems less evident. The contrast between his condemnation of the “Plan of Campaign” and his somewhat lenient view of recent revolutionary propaganda raises questions about the consistency of his moral stance. While the “Plan of Campaign” garnered widespread approval and aimed to address significant grievances, the recent revolutionary program lacked popular support and viable solutions to perceived injustices.

The absence of stern condemnation for the recent insurrection at a time when it might have deterred destructive actions is noted. The Bishop’s acknowledgment that rebellion, to be lawful, must be the act of the entire nation contrasts sharply with his apparent sympathy for the rebels’ cause.

The Bishop’s remarks regarding Mr Asquith’s visit to Dublin, where he acknowledges the rebels as the true representatives of Ireland, further muddle the interpretation of his position. Additionally, his statement that Sinn Fein embodies the true principle hints at a tacit endorsement of the movement.

The impact of the Bishop’s words on impressionable young men, who may interpret his address as theological justification for their revolutionary actions, is a cause for concern. The cheers that greet his words and the juxtaposition of his image with those of revolutionary leaders suggest a perceived alignment between his views and their cause.

The narrative concludes with a reflection on the Bishop’s previous support for constitutional movements and a lament for the current state of affairs, where the constitutional path is threatened by the allure of futile physical force.

In conclusion, while the Bishop of Limerick’s address offers insights into his moral convictions, the inconsistencies in his stance on political movements raise questions about the clarity and coherence of his position.

Weekly Freeman’s Journal – Saturday 23 September 1916