TIPPERARY – Contradictory testimony marked the proceedings before the Tipperary magistrates as William Mackey, a farmer from Ardlowon, Limerick Junction, found himself accused of purchasing military goods from a soldier, John O’Brien of the Munster Fusiliers, who had allegedly deserted from his regiment.

The crux of the case revolved around a pair of military boots and trousers purportedly sold by O’Brien to Mackey. O’Brien claimed to have sold the boots to Mackey for £2, instructing him to discard the old trousers, though the latter were not purchased. Mackey’s wife corroborated this account, stating that O’Brien was offered tea and performed some farm work at Mackey’s request, but no transaction took place.

In a twist, the police discovered O’Brien’s boots and trousers in the well of a nearby outhouse, further complicating matters. However, Mackey and his wife adamantly denied any involvement in purchasing the soldier’s property, asserting that O’Brien had not visited their home on the specified date.

Despite the conflicting accounts, the magistrates ultimately sided with O’Brien’s testimony, leading to Mackey’s acquittal. O’Brien, on the other hand, was fined £5 for his actions.

The case highlights the challenges inherent in adjudicating matters based on conflicting testimony and circumstantial evidence. While the truth may remain elusive in such circumstances, the magistrates’ decision reflects their determination to uphold justice and discern the most credible account amidst the ambiguity of the situation.

Evening Irish Times – Saturday 02 September 1916