The Limerick County Council convened on Saturday to address an important matter brought forth by Mr T. Hurley. The topic of discussion centered around the county’s butter standard and the legal ramifications related to it. The exchange highlighted concerns regarding the frequency of prosecutions for moisture content in butter.
Mr Hurley initiated the conversation by inquiring about the acceptable standard for butter moisture in the county. The Chairman clarified that it wasn’t a standard for the entire county but rather an issue of prosecutorial discretion in cases where the moisture content exceeded a certain threshold. Mr Hurley raised a fundamental concern about how prosecutions were sustained in such cases.
The Chairman explained that the decision to prosecute rested largely with the magistrates, and the standard was somewhat flexible. He noted that some convictions occurred at 20 percent moisture, while Mr Hurley countered that in Newcastle West, convictions were being pursued for as low as 16 percent moisture.
The Chairman revealed that Somerset House set the standard at 16 percent moisture. Mr Hurley expressed frustration over the implications this had on local butter producers, stating that the prosecutions were ruining the butter industry in areas like Newcastle West and Rathkeale. The fear of prosecution discouraged farmers from bringing their butter, leading to the decline of the trade.
Mr J. Ryan joined the discussion, pointing out that prosecutions for moisture content were more frequent than other offences under the Foods and Drugs Act. Mr Hurley agreed, emphasizing the detrimental impact of such prosecutions on the butter industry and advocating for stricter controls over the inspector’s activities.
Mr Coleman intervened, clarifying that the inspector was not nominated by the Council but rather by the Department. As such, the Council had limited control over the inspector’s actions. The Secretary added that the inspector operated under the Food and Drugs Act and reported to the Department. However, the Council provided the necessary funds for the inspector’s activities, implying a certain level of influence.
Mr Coleman suggested that the Council could express its disagreement with the current standard without directly intervening in prosecutorial matters. He believed that the Council’s opinion could have an impact on the situation.
The Chairman emphasized that the Council could not unilaterally change the legal standards set by Somerset House. Despite concerns, they had to adhere to the established regulations. Mr Hurley conceded that he was content with expressing their opinion on the matter but urged the Council to take a stand.
After further deliberation, it was resolved to communicate with the Council’s solicitor regarding the possibility of advocating for change and expressing their disagreement with the existing standard.
Limerick Echo – Tuesday 17 October 1905
