In a recent development, the Roman Catholic Bishops of Limerick and Kildare have expressed reservations regarding the Irish Council Bill, as reported in today’s edition of the Freeman’s Journal. The Bishop of Limerick, characterising the bill as a ‘grotesque measure,’ asserts that it lacks the support of discerning minds, casting doubt on its longevity as the latest offspring of Mr Birrell’s legislative initiatives. He questions the necessity of a measure aimed at the regeneration of Ireland, a proposal oscillating in Irish opinion between indignant rejection and contemptuous toleration. Notably, the Bishop dismisses the notion of Catholics and Protestants being in conflict and suggests that Mr Birrell should refrain from intervening where there is no discord.
Meanwhile, the Bishop of Kildare, the solitary Catholic clerical representative on the Board of Primary Education, takes issue with the provision excluding Catholic clergymen from eligibility for election to the Council, particularly concerning matters related to education. He contends that it is the duty of the Catholic clerical body to assert strong representation at the upcoming convention, advocating for their rights as ordinary citizens.
The Irish Unionist party also registers its discontent with the Irish Council Bill. The Irish Times, in its latest issue, reports that the North Dublin Executive of the United Irish League has decided to urge the forthcoming Nationalist Convention to reject the bill. While anticipating spirited debates at the Convention, the Irish Times maintains its belief that leaders such as Mr Redmond and Mr Dillon will secure a verdict in favour of the bill. The United Irish League, seen as a dominant force under the proposed legislation, is expected to maintain its methods, raising concerns among Unionists. The Irish Times argues against relinquishing parliamentary control over Irish administration, citing the current conditions in certain regions as a compelling reason for strict parliamentary oversight. The publication highlights Mr Birrell’s admission, through what it deems scandalous efforts to downplay it, that the situation does not favour his proposals, which seek legislative endorsement for individuals responsible for the United Irish League’s operations.
In summary, the Irish Council Bill faces criticism from both Catholic bishops and the Unionist party, with divergent concerns ranging from the perceived absurdity of the measure to apprehensions about the composition of the proposed Council. The impending Nationalist Convention promises vigorous discussions on the fate of the bill, reflecting the multifaceted opinions and tensions surrounding this legislative proposal.
Pall Mall Gazette – Monday 13 May 1907
