To the Editor of The Limerick Echo

Dear Sir,

In a recent issue of your esteemed paper, I perused a report on Mr Redmond’s address to the people of New Ross. Throughout his discourse, Mr Redmond frequently intertwined the words “the Empire,” seamlessly blending them with phrases of commendation. It is prudent to remind Mr Redmond that Ireland is not a willing component of the British Empire. Considering the regrettable proceedings in Westminster regarding “The Irish Council Bill,” it is evident that Ireland is not, and has never been, a mere province of England within the Empire.

“We have a separate language, are a separate people,” and irrespective of Mr Redmond’s sentiments, we are as significant a people as any claiming national status. This rhetoric of imperial proclamations in Mr Redmond’s speeches has been persistent. His use of imperial language, showcased at the Queen’s Hall in London a few months ago, saw a historical ratio of about 20 to 1 in favor of imperialism over nationalism. Moreover, his subsequent endorsement of the Irish Council Bill proved to be less than steadfast.

While acknowledging the merits of some Irish Members of Parliament who genuinely espouse nationalist ideals, a majority, seemingly influenced by their leader, appear more aligned with imperialistic sentiments. The term “Nationalist” may no longer be fitting for Mr Redmond and many of his fellow MPs; “Imperialist” seems more apt presently.

Returning to the address in question, the men of ’98 who fought in New Ross did not fight for the “freedom” championed by Mr Redmond and his followers. They fought physically for an independent Ireland. In contrast, Sinn Féin, while prepared for physical resistance, employs a subtler intellectual approach. If the patriots of ’98 were resurrected, it is doubtful they would stand with Mr Redmond and his party.

The essence of parliamentary methods, which Mr Redmond advocates, would likely repel these resolute patriots. The men of ’98 fought, while Mr Redmond and his colleagues merely beg for change. It is time to halt these degrading methods and consider the Sinn Féin movement, which demonstrates a more effective means of achieving our goals.

Sinn Féin’s approach, both comprehensive and efficient, has proven successful in various contexts worldwide. The recent actions of French wine-growers stand as an example. The movement’s accomplishments in recent years are a testament to its potential, surpassing what MPs have achieved through their lengthy parliamentary discourse in St. Stephen’s.

Personally, having once been a loyal supporter of Unionism, I am now a follower of Sinn Féin. Undoubtedly, others may also be wavering in their allegiance. For the sake of God and Ireland, let us embrace Sinn Féin.

Apologies for the extended use of your valuable space, but I believe it is time to give due consideration to an alternative perspective.

Yours faithfully,

Anonymous.

Limerick Echo – Tuesday 02 July 1907