In the aftermath of Mr Balfour’s recent statement in the House of Commons dismissing claims that Mr Wyndham resigned as Irish Secretary due to Ulster Unionist criticisms, questions and skepticism have emerged across the nation. Addressing the controversy, our correspondent Augustine Roche sheds light on the matter, challenging the prevailing narrative.

Roche highlights the widespread ignorance on the subject, both within and outside the House of Commons. He contends that the narrative surrounding Mr Wyndham’s resignation has been largely shaped by the actions of key figures in Irish politics, specifically Messrs. Dillon and Sexton, who wield significant influence over the Irish Party and a prominent newspaper, instrumental in shaping public opinion.

Contrary to the belief that the resignation was a result of the campaign against the policy of conciliation led by Mr William Moore and his Orange associates, Roche argues that it was the strategic moves orchestrated by Dillon and Sexton that dealt the fatal blow. These individuals, Roche claims, ordered an “implacable war” against Wyndham and anyone associated with the policy of appeasement in Ireland.

The correspondent draws attention to legal proceedings at the Limerick Assizes last March, where sworn testimony established the facts surrounding Wyndham’s resignation. He further supports these claims by referencing an article penned by Mr William O’Brien in the August edition of the Nineteenth Century, titled “The Breakdown in Ireland,” which offers comprehensive corroboration of Mr Balfour’s assertion.

As the controversy deepens, Roche’s response not only challenges the prevailing narrative but also raises critical questions about the influence of key players in Irish politics and media. The nation awaits further developments and a clearer understanding of the events leading to Mr Wyndham’s departure from the Irish Secretaryship.

Morning Post – Saturday 03 August 1907