In a response to a telegram from Limerick regarding remarks attributed to him, Mr Wm. O’Brien, Member of Parliament, vehemently clarified his stance on the practicability of Home Rule and took the opportunity to address the nuances of his position.
Contrary to recent statements attributed to him, Mr O’Brien vehemently denied declaring Home Rule as “now more impracticable than an Irish Republic,” dismissing such an assertion as absurd. He sought to set the record straight, emphasizing that his contention was not against the concept of Home Rule itself, but rather against the current political landscape dominated by Mr Redmond’s Party and the Irish Parliamentary Party (IPP).
Mr O’Brien underscored that his reservations about the feasibility of Home Rule were contingent on the present state of affairs, where both the Irish Parliamentary Party and the United Irish League continue to function under what he termed as the “complete political and financial control of a sectarian secret society.” He elabourated on his concerns, asserting that this society’s exclusionary policies, which reportedly bar Irish Protestants from its ranks, hinder the inclusive spirit necessary for effective governance.
In clarifying his position, Mr O’Brien expressed a nuanced perspective on the future of Home Rule. He asserted that his lack of confidence in the current viability of Home Rule was intrinsically linked to the need for Ireland to liberate itself from what he described as “sectarian tyranny.” His vision for the future of Irish governance involves embracing the principles of an All-for-Ireland approach, fostering friendship with the Irish Protestant minority, and establishing a rapport with the entire British nation.
Far from being a detractor of self-governance for Ireland, Mr O’Brien stated that he has consistently advocated for a form of Home Rule that garners near-universal support. He emphasized that, in his view, the achievement of Home Rule becomes feasible when Ireland breaks free from the constraints of sectarianism, embraces inclusivity, and aligns itself with principles that prioritize unity over division.
As political discourse surrounding Home Rule continues, Mr O’Brien’s clarification sheds light on the complexities and nuances inherent in the discussion. The question of governance for Ireland remains not just a matter of political structure but also hinges on fostering a spirit of unity that transcends historical divisions. Mr O’Brien’s vision for an Ireland free from sectarian influences and united in purpose serves as a thought-provoking perspective in the ongoing dialogue about the future of governance in the region.
Irish Independent – Wednesday 25 May 1910
