In a recent article penned by Mrs. Sheehy-Skeffington for an English weekly, the city of Limerick found itself under the scrutiny of what some locals deem as “unjust and misguided.” The writer’s sweeping assertions regarding the people and atmosphere of Limerick have sparked a response from one resident, who, in her own effete way, wishes to set the record straight.
As one of the 30,000 proud inhabitants of Limerick, the author takes issue with the characterization of the city as dull and its people as vacuous. In a passionate defence of her hometown, she challenges the notion that Limerick lacks historical significance and cultural vibrancy. Limerick, she asserts, holds as proud a name as any city in Ireland, and while it may be considered dull from a certain “London standpoint,” the local charm and historical richness should not be overlooked.
The author, identifying herself as a Limerick woman, strongly rejects the idea that the people of Limerick are vacuous. Drawing on personal experience and a four-year stint in Dublin, she challenges the perceived mental superiority of the average middle-class Dublin citizen over their Limerick counterparts. In fact, she contends that Limerick, in her opinion, comes out on top in this comparison.
Despite the absence of high-profile entertainment venues like the “Empire” or “Tivoli,” and even a Hippodrome, the author argues that Limerick does not succumb to ennui. She acknowledges the scarcity of amusements, but highlights the city’s ability to find joy in simpler pleasures. The skating rink, occasional plays or operas at the Royal, dances in winter, and sports and regattas in summer are cherished activities that reflect the city’s preference for more intimate and domestic entertainment.
Contrary to the notion that Limerick depends on external sources for amusement, the author paints a picture of a domesticated people whose hearths and homes serve as the epicentre of gravity and mirth. She suggests that Limerick’s residents possess a considerable fund of exuberant enjoyment of life, though it may not manifest itself in noisy jubilations at every turn.
The article delves into the city’s cultural and historical significance, emphasizing its dignified and semi-cloistered seclusion, which gives way to a spirited fight against injustice when called upon. The resilience of Limerick’s people, both in the past and present, is highlighted as a defining characteristic that has shaped the city’s identity.
Furthermore, the author takes pride in the contributions of Limerick to the wider world. She notes the presence of Limerick names and faces adorning the realms of Art, Music, Literature, Drama, Medicine, and more in Dublin. This, she proposes, is evidence that even beyond the city limits, Limerick has made a mark on the intellectual and cultural landscape.
In conclusion, the response to Mr Sheehy-Skeffington’s critique offers a passionate and articulate defence of Limerick, presenting a nuanced perspective that challenges the sweeping generalizations made about the city and its people. The article provides a local’s insight into the cultural fabric of Limerick, celebrating its history, resilience, and contributions to broader fields, all while maintaining a tone of pride and conviction.
Dublin Leader – Saturday 16 December 1911
