Recent correspondence has shed light on the relationship between Mr William O’Brien and the Irish Party, revealing intriguing insights into their attitudes towards each other. The unfolding exchange centres on O’Brien’s place within the party’s ranks.

In response to a resolution from Croom, Co. Limerick, Mr John Redmond, a prominent figure within the Irish Party, has offered his perspective. Redmond suggests that if O’Brien desires reconnection with the party, he should retake the pledge and engage in discussions to address any differences he may have with fellow party members. This call for a return to party principles seems to emphasize the importance of unity within the movement.

Mr Michael Davitt has also entered the discourse, offering a more in-depth perspective on the matter. In his communication, Davitt asserts that the decision ultimately lies with Mr Redmond. This suggests that the Irish Party’s leadership will determine the future course of action regarding O’Brien’s status.

Interestingly, Mr John Dillon appears to have anticipated his leader’s response. His communication on the issue, deemed by some, including Father Clancy of Kilkee, as a ‘non possumus and deplorable,’ indicates a reluctance to engage further with O’Brien’s position.

The exchange seems to suggest that the Irish Party’s officials may no longer consider William O’Brien, a key promoter of the Land Conference, to hold the same level of influence within the party. The tone of the correspondence reflects a firm stance on party principles and a potential shift in the dynamics of the Irish political landscape.

Free Press (Wexford) – Saturday 07 April 1906