Limerick, Friday – An unusual and intriguing case unfolded at the Petty Sessions today, one that had the community buzzing with curiosity and incredulity. A ten-year-old lad found himself in the dock, facing charges of stealing stage “properties” valued at £5 from the Fayecove Theatre, which is affectionately known as ‘The Patrick Mullins.’

The peculiar tale took a fascinating turn when Patrick Mullins, aged 13, took the stand to testify. Mullins revealed that he was part of an amateur theatrical company, with their headquarters located in a humble backhouse off Mongrel Street. The company, it was disclosed, paid a weekly rent of sixpence for the privilege of using this space.

The defendant, in this case, brought forth an assortment of items, including yellow garments and two revolvers. Astonishingly, he claimed to have procured these items from Glasgow. In exchange for these stage “properties,” young Mullins paid him the sum of £5.

During the proceedings, Hayes, senior, the father of the youthful defendant, offered his perspective on the matter. He explained that his work commitments kept him occupied throughout the day, making it challenging for him to closely supervise his son’s activities. Hayes senior also mentioned that his son had been subjected to chastisement on previous occasions, suggesting that he had been no stranger to mischief.

In his defence, the youthful defendant painted a picture of peer pressure, explaining that it was the other boys who had influenced and coerced him into acquiring these stage “properties.” He emphasized that his companions were well aware of the source of these items, making it a rather tempting proposition for him.

In response to these revelations, Mr Hickson, R.M. (Resident Magistrate), acknowledged that the defendant had found himself in trouble on previous occasions. However, he expressed his concern over the implications of the amateur theatrical company, describing it as a “great inducement to larceny.”

The case took a decisive turn as the magistrate rendered his judgment. The defendant, who had found himself entangled in a web of theatrical intrigue, was now faced with the consequences of his actions. He was fined as a penalty for his involvement in the theft of stage properties.

In a related development, orders were issued to the police to disband the amateur theatrical company, as it was deemed to be a source of temptation and mischief. This move aimed to mitigate the risk of future incidents similar to the one that had unfolded in the courtroom.

As the curtain fell on this unusual case in Limerick, the community was left with much to ponder. The world of amateur theater had provided the backdrop for a curious theft, ultimately leading to a stern judgment and the dissolution of a young troupe’s ambitions. It was a reminder that even in the realm of amateur dramatics, the law held sway, and justice would be served when its boundaries were tested.

Freeman’s Journal – Saturday 25 August 1906