Rathkeale, Limerick – In a dramatic turn of events, a sworn inquiry in Rathkeale witnessed sensational developments that left the local community abuzz with intrigue. The inquiry, presided over by Messrs. Coffey and Price, inspectors from the Local Government Board, took an unexpected twist.
During the proceedings, Mr T. Hartigan, B.E., made a startling revelation that sent shockwaves through the inquiry. He expressed his belief that, in some instances, certain Councillors may have had a pecuniary interest in contracts awarded by the Council, potentially implying that they were benefiting financially from these contracts themselves.
Mr Coffey, one of the inspectors, immediately sought further clarification from Mr Hartigan regarding the basis for such a serious accusation. In response, Mr Hartigan explained that it was not his duty to act as a policeman within the Council, but he had become privy to persistent rumors and allegations suggesting that specific individuals, presumably Councillors, had family members with financial interests in various contracts awarded by the Council.
When pressed by Mr Coffey to provide specific names and details to substantiate his claims, Mr Hartigan hesitated, citing the awkward position he would be placed in by disclosing such information. Sensing the gravity of the situation, Mr Atkinson, S.L. (Solicitor at Law), intervened, asserting that it would be unfair to request names from Mr Hartigan as doing so could potentially implicate him in legal action.
After private deliberations between the inspectors, Mr Coffey made an important announcement. In order to allow Mr Hartigan the opportunity to consider his position and weigh the consequences of his statement, the inquiry would be adjourned until September 5th.
Meanwhile, Mr Philip O’Sullivan, a solicitor from Limerick, continued to represent Mr T. B. Clerk during the inquiry, marking another layer of complexity to this already intriguing and potentially scandalous situation.
The Rathkeale sworn inquiry had taken an unexpected and sensational turn, leaving many questions unanswered and raising concerns about the integrity of the local governance. The adjournment of the inquiry to September 5th only added to the suspense surrounding this unfolding story, as the community eagerly awaited further revelations and developments.
Freeman’s Journal – Monday 27 August 1906
