Ireland – The Royal Irish Constabulary finds itself in an unprecedented predicament during Mr Birrell’s regime, grappling with extraordinary difficulties that threaten the force’s morale and effectiveness. Comprising the sons of peasants, small farmers, and traders, the constabulary has earned the moniker of “the best gendarmerie in the world.” However, recent events have cast a shadow over their ability to maintain peace and order in the face of rising tensions.
The force’s officers and men, drawn from the local populace, are confronting challenges that extend beyond their duties. The refusal of Chief Constable to invoke the Crimes Act has reportedly had a demoralizing effect on the constabulary. Despite their consistent efforts to preserve peace, there is growing concern that the lack of support from high authorities may make life unbearable for those targeted by the United Irish League.
Inquiries into the matter have revealed a disheartening sentiment among the constabulary. The reported reluctance of Chief Constable to utilize the Crimes Act, a potent tool for suppressing agitation and lawlessness in Ireland, has left the force feeling discouraged and helpless. The constabulary, despite their dedication, now grapples with a sense of despondency, given the apparent unwillingness of Mr Birrell to endorse their efforts.
The constabulary’s duties, often of an unpleasant nature, involve nighttime patrols, surveillance, and the retrieval of scattered livestock in the aftermath of reckless acts. Additionally, they find themselves repairing gates and fences, tasks not initially outlined in their enlistment. Despite these challenges and the lack of official recognition, the constabulary has admirably fulfilled its duty, standing as a testament to the force’s value.
A critical aspect of the constabulary’s struggles lies in the unwillingness of juries to convict, as evident in cases related to cattle-driving offences. Statistics from recent trials highlight a significant disparity between the number of individuals charged and the actual convictions. In several instances, juries disagreed or acquitted defendants, reflecting a systemic challenge in securing legal consequences for those engaged in agrarian offences.
For example, during the July sessions, 187 individuals were charged with agrarian offences, but only 57 were tried. Of these, a mere three were convicted, with 31 acquitted, and 28 resulting in jury disagreements. Similar patterns persisted in subsequent trials across different counties, with convictions remaining elusive and disagreements prevalent.
The numbers, verified by authoritative sources, raise questions about the adequacy of existing laws to address the challenges faced by the constabulary. The reliance on ordinary legal mechanisms appears insufficient to punish individuals for whom strong evidence has been presented by the police. The discrepancy between charges, convictions, and disagreements underscores the need for a more comprehensive approach to law enforcement in addressing agrarian offences.
As Parliament reconvenes, these figures are expected to be scrutinized, and the official response from Mr Birrell will likely shed light on the government’s stance on the matter. The Royal Irish Constabulary’s plight underscores the urgency for a reevaluation of strategies to ensure the force’s effectiveness, restore community order, and address the deep-seated issues contributing to the challenges faced by both law enforcement and the local populace in Ireland.
Daily Telegraph & Courier (London) – Monday 06 January 1908
