In a recent address to the teachers of Limerick City and County, the Most Rev. Dr O’Dwyer shared his strong views on the state of Irish primary education. Drawing attention to the historical context, he noted that it had been 10 years since he stood in the same hall, supporting National teachers in their quest for the resolution of their grievances. Despite the passing years, he observed that the same agitation persisted, highlighting what he deemed a concerning aspect of governance in Ireland.

Approaching the matter from an educational standpoint, His Lordship expressed deep concern over the necessity of such public agitations among teachers. He emphasized that teachers should not be compelled by adverse treatment to engage in public movements. Such circumstances, he argued, are detrimental both to the educators themselves and to the schools they serve. Instead of focusing on refining their teaching methods through periodic conferences, teachers find themselves transformed into a quasi-Trades Union, seeking to secure a decent livelihood.

In his address, the Most Rev. Dr O’Dwyer advocated for a fair and honest assessment of the payment structure for teachers. He urged for a comprehensive settlement that addresses all aspects of primary education, allowing teachers to dedicate themselves to their crucial responsibilities without the need for recurrent agitations. Aligning with a resolution adopted by the teachers, he proposed a unified approach to presenting their case to the government, advocating for a singular financial settlement that covers all their legitimate claims.

A notable concern raised by His Lordship was the alleged discrepancy in funding between Ireland, England, and Scotland. If the reported figures were accurate, he labelled it a case of “discreditable injustice” that required prompt redress. Expressing confidence in the Irish Parliamentary Party, he believed they would ensure a fair financial settlement that prevents Irish education from being left in a financially strained state compared to its counterparts.

The Most Rev. Dr O’Dwyer went on to voice moral objections to the National Board’s decision to amalgamate boys’ and girls’ schools. He contended that such amalgamation was not only morally detrimental to the children but also objected to it on educational grounds. Describing it as a retrograde movement, he called for a departure from the existing framework of education in National Schools. His Lordship expressed the need to align the education of boys and girls, particularly boys, with their future careers, criticizing the policies adopted by the Commissioner recently as impediments to this goal.

In conclusion, the Most Rev. Dr O’Dwyer’s address to the teachers of Limerick sheds light on the challenges and concerns within the Irish primary education system. As the call for a comprehensive settlement echoes, the spotlight remains on Limerick, where educators strive for a fair and just educational landscape for of both teachers and students.

Irish Independent – Monday 05 February 1912