At recent meetings of local councils in Limerick, strong protests were voiced against the implementation of a new education rule, namely rule 127 [b), issued by the Commissioners of National Education. The new rule has raised concerns among various segments of the community, with claims that it infringes upon parental rights and poses a threat to the livelihoods of male teachers in the county.

During the County Council meeting chaired by Mr T. Hurley Jr., vice-chairman, Mr Collins presented a resolution opposing the new rule. The resolution strongly condemned the new rule for its perceived infringement on parental rights and its potential to harm the future prospects of male teachers in the county. It was argued that the rule could lead to an increase in mixed-gender schools, compromise the quality of primary education, and negatively impact the educational landscape. The County Council pledged support for the opposition efforts of school managers against this new rule, which they deemed ill-conceived and harmful to education. Copies of the resolution were to be sent to key stakeholders, including the Lord Bishop of the Diocese, the Chief Secretary for Ireland, the Commissioners of National Education, and the Chairman of the Irish Parliamentary Party.

A similar sentiment was echoed in the Kilmallock District Council meeting, where Mr P. Hayes proposed a resolution denouncing the new rule’s potential consequences. He emphasized that the rule could lead to the displacement of many male teachers without compensation and hinder students’ futures. He urged attendees to stand united against its implementation. The resolution was seconded by Mr Murphy and gained unanimous support.

The opposition to the new education rule reflected a broader concern within the local community about its impact on education quality and the livelihoods of teachers, leading to a unified call for reconsideration and action against its implementation.

Limerick Echo – Tuesday 11 April 1905