In the realm of arguments against the revival of the Irish language, some stand out for their shallowness and prejudice rather than any semblance of reasoned discourse. It’s worth examining a few of these points to illustrate how misguided opposition can be, even though they might not deserve serious consideration. Such arguments are typically driven by animosity toward the Gaelic movement and lack any logical foundation. Let’s explore a couple of these points and their counterarguments:
1. Claim: There’s No Literature in the Irish Language
This assertion is often made by individuals who are unfamiliar with the Irish language and its literature. Experts such as Dr Kuno Meyer, who dedicated their lives to the study of Irish language and literature, assert that there exists a marvelous medieval literature in Irish, comparable to the best in the world. Dr Douglas Hyde, a prominent figure in the Gaelic League, has spoken of over 17,000 volumes of native Irish literature from before the seventeenth century. The opinion of those who know the language and its literature firsthand is far more reliable than those who critique the Gaelic movement without understanding its depth.
2. Claim: Irish Language Literature is Immoral
Opponents sometimes assert that Irish language literature is immoral, yet this claim is baseless when examined closely. Prominent individuals such as Father Dinneen and Father O’Leary, who are well-acquainted with the literature, have not made such claims. If the literature were indeed immoral, these clergy members would undoubtedly warn against it. The efforts of individuals like “an t-atair Peadar” (likely referring to Peadar Ua Laoghaire) to promote Irish language literature demonstrate that it is far from immoral and instead forms a crucial part of Ireland’s cultural heritage.
3. Claim: Studying Foreign Languages is More Practical
Some suggest that Irish youth should prioritize studying French or German to secure commercial opportunities abroad. However, this argument paints a bleak picture of Ireland’s future, assuming that emigration is the norm. The Gaelic movement is rooted in self-help and empowerment, aiming to uplift Ireland and provide a compelling reason for youth to remain in their own land. While foreign languages may be important, they should not overshadow the revival of Irish as an invaluable aspect of Ireland’s cultural identity.
4. Combining Entertainment with the Gaelic League Movement
Reverend Father Wall emphasized that Gaelic League branches should attract members through various types of entertainment. It’s essential to realize that the Gaelic movement isn’t solely about language revival but encompasses the revitalization of Irish music, dance, games, and more. Promoting these aspects can make branches more vibrant and appealing to young individuals, ultimately serving as an entry point for them to embrace the broader ideals of the Gaelic League.
In summary, arguments against the Gaelic movement often stem from prejudice and a lack of understanding. The movement is not just about reviving the Irish language but encompasses a multifaceted revival of Irish culture and identity. Combining entertainment with the Gaelic League’s objectives can attract more members, particularly young people, and contribute to the preservation and celebration of Ireland’s unique heritage.
Limerick Echo – Tuesday 20 February 1906
