Wind And Bargains – Emerald Archives

Ireland in 1222 was neither a single kingdom nor a country governed in one uniform way. Gaelic rulers retained power across extensive territories, while the lordship claimed by the young Henry III of England was strongest in the towns, castles and lordships of the east and south-east. Authority was personal, negotiated and often fragile. This was made especially clear by the return of Hugh de Lacy, the dispossessed earl of Ulster, and by an extraordinary storm remembered in the annals as the “great wind”.

The year’s evidence is uneven. Irish annals preserve vivid notices of conflict, weather, deaths and local disorder, while English royal records illuminate the Crown’s dealings with magnates and the extension of legal procedure in the lordship. They do not offer a complete picture of ordinary life. Yet, read together, they show a society in which war, lordship, church life, farming, shipping and the weather were tightly connected.

A Dispossessed Earl

Hugh de Lacy’s position lay at the centre of the year’s politics. He was the younger son of the Anglo-Norman lord of Meath and had been made earl of Ulster after helping King John to displace John de Courcy. In 1210, however, John stripped him of Ulster after the de Lacys had supported William de Braose against the king. Hugh escaped through Scotland and spent years abroad, including service in the Albigensian crusade in southern France. His claim to Ulster remained a dangerous unresolved question.

By 1222 Hugh had returned to the political orbit of Henry III’s government. He had sought the restoration of his inheritance, but the Crown was unwilling simply to hand back the strategically vital earldom of Ulster, with its castles and sea routes. In December 1222 Henry restored lands Hugh held through his wife and lands derived from his brother Walter, but withheld Ulster itself. This was a compromise rather than reconciliation: it acknowledged Hugh’s standing without surrendering royal control over the most contentious part of his former power.

The settlement did not remove the threat of conflict. Later narrative reconstructions place Hugh’s larger renewed rebellion and siege activity in Ulster chiefly in 1223–24. The annalistic record, however, associates a dramatic confrontation with 1222: “the son of Hugh de Lacy” came to Ireland against the English king’s will, joined Áed Ó Néill of Cenél nEógain, devastated parts of Meath, Leinster and Ulster, and destroyed the castle at Culrathain, modern Coleraine. The wording reflects the annalists’ Gaelic political perspective, calling the colonial forces the “Foreigners of Ireland”.

This episode must be handled cautiously. Medieval Irish annals do not all align perfectly with modern calendar years, and the same sequence is placed differently in related compilations. Nonetheless, the entries preserve an important truth about 1222: Hugh’s cause and Áed Ó Néill’s northern power could combine to challenge the lordship’s military establishment. The dispute was not a simple contest between “Irish” and “English”. A dispossessed Anglo-Norman earl found a useful ally in a Gaelic ruler, while other Gaelic kings could cooperate with the king’s officials when it suited their interests.

Terms at Dundalk

The confrontation reported by the Annals of Ulster is striking for both its scale and its outcome. The “Foreigners of Ireland” supposedly assembled twenty-four battalions at Dundalk, while Ó Néill and de Lacy approached with four. Such figures should not be treated as a modern troop return: a battalion was a rhetorical and flexible way of describing a contingent, not a reliably standardised unit. The entry nevertheless conveys the mustering of a substantial coalition in the frontier zone between the lordship and Ulster.

Rather than recording a pitched battle, the annal says that the opposing forces granted Ó Néill “the award of his own word”: in effect, they accepted terms associated with him. The fuller Loch Cé version names a broad array of interests drawn into the crisis, including Cathal Crobderg Ó Conchobair of Connacht, Donnchad Cairbrech Ó Briain of Thomond and Diarmait Cluasach Mac Carthaig of Desmond, besides the lordship’s settlers and magnates. Whether every detail belongs precisely to 1222 or to the wider crisis that followed, the record reveals the political logic of the period. Hostages, truces, submissions and negotiated guarantees could matter as much as conquest.

Culrathain itself symbolised the stakes. A castle had been raised there only a few years earlier by the settlers of Ulster, reportedly using the materials of the surrounding settlement while leaving the church standing. To destroy such a fortress was to contest not merely a garrison but a claim to organise land, labour, routes and security. Castles were military positions, administrative centres and expressions of lordship. Their construction or demolition affected the people who supplied them with food, transport, building work and service.

The Great Wind

A firmly dated notice from the Annals of Inisfallen gives 1222 another, island-wide dimension. It records a great wind throughout Ireland that damaged houses, churches and large woods and sank many ships; it was remembered as the “great wind”. The Annals of Loch Cé also records destructive losses to buildings and vessels. Neither source identifies a precise day, locality or death toll, and it would be wrong to supply them. Their agreement, however, makes clear that the storm was remembered as exceptional.

For a mainly rural society, high winds could inflict damage far beyond fallen roofs. Buildings commonly depended on timber frames, thatch, wattle and other vulnerable materials. Damage to woodland meant the loss of fuel, fencing, pannage and building timber, while repairs demanded labour at a time when households also had to attend livestock and crops. Churches were both places of worship and important local institutions; their damage would have touched communities materially as well as spiritually.

The loss of ships was particularly serious. Ireland’s rivers, coasts and sea lanes connected ports and smaller landing places with Britain and the Irish Sea world. Vessels carried people, animals, foodstuffs and high-value goods, and they enabled royal communication and military movement as well as trade. A storm that sank “many ships” could disrupt several kinds of life at once. It also sharpened the practical vulnerability of a lordship whose officials and magnates depended on crossings between Ireland, Wales and England.

Church, Morality And Memory

Religious institutions remained central to the year’s record. The Annals of Inisfallen places the death of Edmund, bishop of Cell Da Lua, or Killaloe, in 1222. Other annalistic compilations place the deaths of bishops of Kildare and Ferns in their entries for 1222, though the Inisfallen and Loch Cé chronologies put those deaths in 1223. This discrepancy is a reminder that annal headings are not always interchangeable with a modern calendar. What can safely be said is that the early 1220s saw turnover among senior churchmen in Leinster and Munster.

The annals also notice the death of Tadhg Ó Baighill, praised as a benefactor who distributed jewels and riches to people of every profession. Such praise was conventional, but it points to real expectations of elite generosity. Hospitality, gifts and support for dependants helped sustain a ruler’s reputation and following. The same sources report the death of Mór, daughter of Ó Baighill and wife of Amhlaibh Ó Beolláin, showing how women of leading kindreds appear in the record through marriage alliances and commemoration.

A darker entry concerns Niall Ó Néill’s violation of Derry in connection with a daughter of Ó Catháin. The annalist interpreted his subsequent early death as divine and Columban punishment. Modern readers should not mistake this for a neutral legal report. It is a moral narrative, rooted in Derry’s special status as a church associated with Columba. Even so, it demonstrates that sanctuary, sexual conduct, kinship and political power were matters of public concern, judged through both Christian and dynastic ideas of justice.

Land, Work And Uneven Authority

Most people in 1222 were farmers, herders, craftspeople, fishers or dependants of ecclesiastical and secular estates. Their names seldom survive. Their lives were shaped by the demands of rulers and lords: food renders, labour services, hospitality, military provisioning and the risks of raiding. The killing of Gilla Mochoinni Ó Cathail, ruler of Cenél Áeda east and west, reportedly after betrayal by his own people, is a small but revealing notice. It shows that local lordship could be precarious and that factional violence reached well below the level of kings and earls.

The island’s regional differences mattered. In the lordship’s more settled lowland districts, castles, manors, boroughs and churches increasingly channelled rents, market exchange and legal claims. In Gaelic lordships, kingship rested on kinship, clientship, tribute, cattle wealth, ecclesiastical connections and the capacity to lead armed followers. These were not sealed worlds. Gaelic families held land or influence in colonial districts; settlers and magnates made alliances with Irish rulers; merchants, clerics and travellers crossed political boundaries. The de Lacy–Ó Néill connection is the year’s clearest illustration of that overlap.

Trade continued despite insecurity. Dublin, Drogheda, Waterford, Wexford, Cork, Limerick and New Ross connected agricultural hinterlands to the Irish Sea and beyond. Hides, wool, livestock products, fish, grain and timber could be exchanged for salt, wine, cloth, metalware and other imports. The great wind did not end this commerce, but it exposed its dependence on seaworthy vessels and safe harbours. In a year of political bargaining and destructive weather, the routines of cultivation, repair, exchange and worship remained indispensable.

A Year Of Contingency

In 1222, royal policy sought to contain Hugh de Lacy without restoring his full power, while Irish political memory preserved the spectacle of his alliance with Áed Ó Néill and the terms won at Dundalk. The year also brought a storm powerful enough to enter several annalistic traditions. Together these developments show medieval Ireland as a connected but divided island: its rulers contended over castles and hostages, its churches framed moral and communal life, and its households faced the immediate consequences of wind, warfare and uncertain authority.

Primary Sources

Tags: 1210s, 1220s, 1222, 1223, Agricultural History, Angevin Ireland, Architectural History, Carthaigh's BookCELT, Close Rolls Preserved, Cluasach Mac Carthaig, Daniel BrownA Community, Documents Relating, Dundalk Tow, Electronic Texts, First Earl, Four Masters, Four Realms, Government History, Henry III, III Fine RollsCalenda, Inisfallen Project RecordCELT, Irish History, Irish Rebellions, King Joh, Legal History, Loch CéAnnals, Maritime History, Middle AgesIreland, Military Garrisons, Military History, Military Units, ook Project RecordLacy, Political History, Primary SourcesThe Annals, Religious History, Trade and Commerce, WaterfordGalway CityLooking Wes, William Marshal’s Lordship, Wind And Bargains